News, Strategies and Resources for Senior HR Executives  
 
Search
powered by Workindex®
Advanced Search | Browse the Directory
Web Exclusive Content
Home
HR News Analysis
Features
Columnists
People
Resources and Tools
Technology Center
Legal Clinic
HRE Conferences
HRE Rankings
Webinars
RSS
Career Center
HR Internet Search
powered by workindex
HRE Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

HREOnlineTM Update
HRE News & Analysis
Bill Kutik's HR Technology Column
Carol Harnett's Benefits Column
Peter Cappelli's Talent Management Column
Special Offers
People on the Move
Susan Meisinger's HR Leadership Column
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy

 

Print Email Write to the Editor Reprints

Proper Handling of the Also-Rans



By Scott Flander

In CHRO succession, keeping the also-rans happy can be tricky -- and can't be neglected.

There are basically three types of people who don't get chosen for the top job, says Charles Tharp, president of the National Academy of Human Resources, based in New Canaan, Conn., and the former HR chief at Bristol-Myers Squibb.

The first are those you believe could one day be a CHRO, but at the moment don't have the required knowledge or experience.

"That's when you have the frank discussion about what they need," says Tharp. "Exposure to the board, working with the CEO, whatever it is. You say, 'Here's what you don't have, now let's make sure you get it.' "

The second category "are the people who think they can get it, but you don't think they can," says Tharp. "That's when you sit down with them and say, 'I really like what you're doing, but if you want to be in charge of HR, it can't happen here.' It can either be a happy discussion or an ugly discussion, but you have to be honest with them. They can adjust their career sights or go to another company. If you want them to stay, you can pay them well and give them new things to do."

The third type is the highly qualified candidate who loses out by a very narrow margin.

"That's the person you want to give an expanded role to," and some kind of retention award, such as a stock award, says Tharp. "That's the person you want to stay, and you know people are going to be recruiting them like crazy. If they love the company, they'll stay if they can grow and make good money, but someone's going to be recruiting them every week."

Bill Conaty, who retired last November as senior vice president of corporate human resources at General Electric, says he took several steps to make sure the unsuccessful top candidates for his job stayed with the company.

"We tried to make it as interesting as we could and as attractive as we could," says Conaty, who was CHRO for 15 years at the Fairfield, Conn.-based company.

All were give much more responsibility, he says. "They picked up a significant piece of the action that will give them additional exposure to the CEO office."

In addition, Conaty and CEO Jeffrey Immelt made it clear to those who didn't get the top job how much they meant to the company -- and how much Conaty and Immelt hoped they would stay.

"That has no financial value, but it has some psychic value and personal value," says Conaty.

All of the unsuccessful candidates, he notes, are still with the company.


July 1, 2008

Copyright 2008© LRP Publications